Remove italic from abstract.
This commit is contained in:
64
index.html
64
index.html
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
|
||||
Working Paper. <span class="links">[<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_arbDEX');return false">Abstract</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_arbDEX">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are alternative venues to centralized exchanges to trade
|
||||
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are alternative venues to centralized exchanges to trade
|
||||
cryptocurrencies (CEXs) and have become increasingly popular. An arbitrage opportunity arises when
|
||||
the exchange rate of two cryptocurrencies in a DEX differs from that in a CEX. Arbitrageurs can then
|
||||
trade on the DEX and CEX to make a profit. Trading on the DEX incurs a gas fee, which determines the
|
||||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
|
||||
opportunity is small; (ii) the probability of the arbitrageurs choosing a higher gas fee is lower;
|
||||
(iii) the arbitrageurs pay a higher gas fee and trade more when the arbitrage opportunity becomes
|
||||
larger and when liquidity becomes higher. The above findings are consistent with our empirical
|
||||
study. </i>
|
||||
study.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
|
||||
Working Paper. <span class="links">[<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_TaxTimeVarying');return false">Abstract</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_TaxTimeVarying">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>The capital gains tax rate has fluctuated significantly over time, leading to substantial changes in
|
||||
The capital gains tax rate has fluctuated significantly over time, leading to substantial changes in
|
||||
investors' optimal strategies, as documented by the empirical studies. This paper proposes a novel
|
||||
continuous-time portfolio selection framework with a time-varying capital gains tax rate. Featuring
|
||||
differential tax rate announcement time and implementation time, our framework is able to capture
|
||||
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
|
||||
The strength of the transitory effect depends on the size of the tax rate change, and the tax rate
|
||||
uncertainty mostly affects the transitory effect and has a negligible impact on the permanent
|
||||
effect. Moreover, the permanent effect vanishes under a zero interest rate while the transitory
|
||||
effect persists. </i>
|
||||
effect persists.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5305617" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_periodicEvaluation">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>A fund manager's performance is often evaluated annually and compared with a benchmark, such as a
|
||||
A fund manager's performance is often evaluated annually and compared with a benchmark, such as a
|
||||
market index. In addition, the manager may be subject to trading constraints, such as limited use of
|
||||
leverage, no short-selling, and a forced liquidation clause. We formulate this as a periodic
|
||||
evaluation problem with a non-concave utility, a stochastic reference point, and trading
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
|
||||
this local concavity/convexity weakens and shifts inward from the liquidation boundary to the
|
||||
interior region as the evaluation horizon increases. As a result, the joint effect of periodic
|
||||
evaluation and forced liquidation can generate highly nonlinear investment strategies, which is
|
||||
helpful in understanding the complexity of trading strategies in the loss region.</i>
|
||||
helpful in understanding the complexity of trading strategies in the loss region.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16106" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_dataAsset">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Data assets are data commodities that have been processed, produced, priced, and traded based on
|
||||
Data assets are data commodities that have been processed, produced, priced, and traded based on
|
||||
actual demand. Reasonable pricing mechanism for data assets is essential for developing the data
|
||||
market and realizing their value. Most existing literature approaches data asset pricing from the
|
||||
seller's perspective, focusing on data properties and collection costs, however, research from the
|
||||
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
|
||||
existing research results, we simplify the value function, using mathematical analysis and
|
||||
differential equation theory, we derive general expressions for data assets price and explore their
|
||||
properties under various conditions. Furthermore, we derive the explicit pricing formulas for
|
||||
specific scenarios and provide numerical illustration to describe how to use our pricing model.</i>
|
||||
specific scenarios and provide numerical illustration to describe how to use our pricing model.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -241,14 +241,14 @@
|
||||
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5262988" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_arbPerp">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Perpetual contracts, designed to track the underlying price through a funding swap mechanism, have
|
||||
Perpetual contracts, designed to track the underlying price through a funding swap mechanism, have
|
||||
gained significant popularity in cryptocurrency markets. However, observed price discrepancies
|
||||
between perpetual contracts and the underlying asset cannot be explained solely by transaction fees.
|
||||
By examining the impact of the clamping function inherent in the funding swap mechanism -- an
|
||||
overlooked aspect in existing literature -- we derive model-free no-arbitrage bounds for perpetual
|
||||
contracts. Our findings reveal that these bounds persist as intervals even without transaction fees,
|
||||
due to the clamping function. Empirical analysis using two years of Binance data supports the
|
||||
validity of our proposed bounds. </i>
|
||||
validity of our proposed bounds.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -259,14 +259,14 @@
|
||||
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4952040" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_TaxTC">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We develop a dynamic portfolio model incorporating capital gains tax (CGT), transaction costs, and
|
||||
We develop a dynamic portfolio model incorporating capital gains tax (CGT), transaction costs, and
|
||||
year-end taxation. We find that even tiny transaction costs can lead to significant deferral of
|
||||
large losses and transaction costs affect loss deferrals much more than gain deferrals. Our model
|
||||
can thus help explain the puzzle that even when investors face equal long-term/short-term CGT rates,
|
||||
they may still defer realizing large capital losses for an extended period of time, displaying the
|
||||
disposition effect. In addition, we find misestimating transaction costs is costly. We also provide
|
||||
several unique, empirically testable predictions and shed light on recently proposed tax policy
|
||||
changes.</i>
|
||||
changes.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13291" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_AMM">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Automated market makers are a popular mechanism used on decentralized exchange, through which users
|
||||
Automated market makers are a popular mechanism used on decentralized exchange, through which users
|
||||
trade assets with each other directly and automatically through a liquidity pool and a fixed pricing
|
||||
function. The liquidity provider contributes to the liquidity pool by supplying assets to the pool,
|
||||
and in return, they earn trading fees from investors who trade in the pool. We propose a model of
|
||||
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
|
||||
strategy and the optimal design of the automated market maker that maximizes the liquidity
|
||||
provider's utility. We find that the optimal unit trading fee increases in the volatility of the
|
||||
fundamental exchange rate of the two assets. We also find that the optimal pricing function is
|
||||
chosen to make the asset allocation in the liquidity pool efficient for the liquidity provider.</i>
|
||||
chosen to make the asset allocation in the liquidity pool efficient for the liquidity provider.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
|
||||
href=" https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4801520" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_LocalVol">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We study non-parametric calibration of local volatility models, which is formulated as an inverse
|
||||
We study non-parametric calibration of local volatility models, which is formulated as an inverse
|
||||
problem of partial differential equations with Tikhonov regularization. In contrast to the existing
|
||||
literature minimizing the distance between theoretical and market prices of options as a calibration
|
||||
criterion, we instead minimize the distance between theoretical and market implied volatilities,
|
||||
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
|
||||
well-posedness of the calibration problem. In particular, comparing to Jiang and Tao (2001), we
|
||||
obtain a global uniqueness result, where no additional weight functions are required. Numerical
|
||||
results reveal that our method achieves a better trade-off between minimizing calibration errors and
|
||||
reducing overfitting.</i>
|
||||
reducing overfitting.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4671774" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_LOB">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>This paper investigates an optimal investment problem in an illiquid market, modeling explicitly the
|
||||
This paper investigates an optimal investment problem in an illiquid market, modeling explicitly the
|
||||
effects of three key features of market microstructure --- market tightness, market depth, and
|
||||
finite market resilience --- on the investor's decision. By employing a Bachelier process to model
|
||||
the dynamic of the fundamental value of the asset and assuming CARA-type utility for the investor,
|
||||
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@
|
||||
activities to align with the aim portfolio in the presence of market resilience. To quantify this
|
||||
timing decision, we introduce a patience index that enables investors to strike a balance among
|
||||
various competing goals, including achieving currently optimal risk exposure, incorporating signals
|
||||
about future predictions, and minimizing trading costs, by leveraging market resilience.</i>
|
||||
about future predictions, and minimizing trading costs, by leveraging market resilience.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02178" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_NonconcaveTC">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>This paper studies a finite-horizon portfolio selection problem with non-concave terminal utility and
|
||||
This paper studies a finite-horizon portfolio selection problem with non-concave terminal utility and
|
||||
proportional transaction costs. The commonly used concavification principle for terminal value is no
|
||||
longer valid here, and we establish a proper theoretical characterization of this problem. We first
|
||||
give the asymptotic terminal behavior of the value function, which implies any transaction close to
|
||||
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
|
||||
asymptotic terminal condition. Via numerical analyses, we find that the introduction of transaction
|
||||
costs into non-concave utility maximization problems can prevent the portfolio from unbounded
|
||||
leverage and make a large short position in stock optimal despite a positive risk premium and
|
||||
symmetric transaction costs.</i>
|
||||
symmetric transaction costs.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12445" target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_StableCoin">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Stable coins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to other stable financial assets such as U.S. dollar,
|
||||
Stable coins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to other stable financial assets such as U.S. dollar,
|
||||
are desirable for payments within blockchain networks, whereby being often called the “Holy Grail of
|
||||
cryptocurrency.” However, existing cryptocurrencies are too volatile for these purposes. By using
|
||||
the option pricing theory, we design several dual-class structures that offer a fixed income crypto
|
||||
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@
|
||||
understand the impact of the proposed coins on the speculative and non-speculative demands of
|
||||
cryptocurrencies, we study equilibrium with and without the stable coins. Our investigation of the
|
||||
values of stable coins in presence of jump risk and black-swan type events shows the robustness of
|
||||
the design.</i>
|
||||
the design.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/moor.2022.1307" target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_LiqPre">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We study a risk-sharing economy where an arbitrary number of heterogenous agents trades an arbitrary
|
||||
We study a risk-sharing economy where an arbitrary number of heterogenous agents trades an arbitrary
|
||||
number of risky assets subject to quadratic transaction costs. For linear state dynamics, the
|
||||
forward-backward stochastic differential equations characterizing equilibrium asset prices and
|
||||
trading strategies in this context reduce to a system of matrix-valued Riccati equations. We prove
|
||||
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
|
||||
to approximate the corresponding equilibrium for small transaction costs. These tractable
|
||||
approximation formulas make it feasible to calibrate the model to time series of prices and trading
|
||||
volume, and to study the cross-section of liquidity premia earned by assets with higher and lower
|
||||
trading costs. This is illustrated by an empirical case study.</i>
|
||||
trading costs. This is illustrated by an empirical case study.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4407" target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_LETF">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>Although leveraged ETFs are popular products for retail investors, how to hedge them poses a great
|
||||
Although leveraged ETFs are popular products for retail investors, how to hedge them poses a great
|
||||
challenge to financial institutions. We develop an optimal rebalancing (hedging) model for leveraged
|
||||
ETFs in a comprehensive setting, including overnight market closure and market frictions. The model
|
||||
allows for an analytical optimal rebalancing strategy.
|
||||
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@
|
||||
and Pedersen (2013)</a> from a constant weight between current and future positions to a
|
||||
time-varying weight, because the rebalancing performance is monitored only at discrete time points
|
||||
but the rebalancing takes place continuously. Empirical findings and implications for the weekend
|
||||
effect and the intraday trading volume are also presented.</i>
|
||||
effect and the intraday trading volume are also presented.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -431,12 +431,12 @@
|
||||
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/moor.2020.1061" target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_FK">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We establish a stochastic representation for a class of nonlocal parabolic terminal-boundary value
|
||||
We establish a stochastic representation for a class of nonlocal parabolic terminal-boundary value
|
||||
problems, whose terminal and boundary conditions depend on the solution in the interior domain; in
|
||||
particular, the solution is represented as the expectation of functionals of a diffusion process
|
||||
with random jumps from boundaries. We discuss three applications of the representation, the first
|
||||
one on the pricing of dual-purpose funds, the second one on the connection to regenerative
|
||||
processes, and the third one on modeling the entropy on a one-dimensional non-rigid body.</i>
|
||||
processes, and the third one on modeling the entropy on a one-dimensional non-rigid body.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
|
||||
href="https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/18M1207776" target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_HFT">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We study Nash equilibria for inventory-averse high-frequency traders (HFTs), who trade to exploit
|
||||
We study Nash equilibria for inventory-averse high-frequency traders (HFTs), who trade to exploit
|
||||
information about future price changes. For discrete trading rounds, the HFTs' optimal trading
|
||||
strategies and their equilibrium price impact are described by a system of nonlinear equations;
|
||||
explicit solutions obtain around the continuous-time limit. Unlike in the risk-neutral case, the
|
||||
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@
|
||||
In contrast, the HFTs' risk-adjusted profits and the equilibrium price impact converge to their
|
||||
risk-neutral counterparts. Compared to a social-planner solution for cooperative HFTs, Nash
|
||||
competition leads to excess trading, so that marginal transaction taxes in fact decrease market
|
||||
liquidity.</i>
|
||||
liquidity.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li><br>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -473,12 +473,12 @@
|
||||
href=https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/28/9/2687/1581078, target="_blank">Article</a>]</span><br>
|
||||
<div class="fade-in" style="display:none" id="abs_taxTiming">
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
<i>We develop an optimal tax-timing model that takes into account asymmetric long-term and short-term
|
||||
We develop an optimal tax-timing model that takes into account asymmetric long-term and short-term
|
||||
tax rates for positive capital gains and limited tax deductibility of capital losses. In contrast to
|
||||
the existing literature, this model can help explain why many investors not only defer short-term
|
||||
capital losses to long term but also defer large long-term capital gains and losses. Because the
|
||||
benefit of tax deductibility of capital losses increases with the short-term tax rates, effective
|
||||
tax rates can decrease as short-term capital gains tax rates increase.</i>
|
||||
tax rates can decrease as short-term capital gains tax rates increase.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user