522 lines
38 KiB
HTML
522 lines
38 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<html>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="fontawesome-free-5.15.3-web/css/all.css">
|
|
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
|
|
<title>Homepage of YANG Chen @ SEEM, CUHK</title>
|
|
<script>
|
|
function toggleAbstract(absId) {
|
|
var x = document.getElementById(absId);
|
|
if (x.style.display === "none") {
|
|
x.style.display = "block";
|
|
} else {
|
|
x.style.display = "none";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
</script>
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
|
|
|
|
<div class="navbar">
|
|
<a href="#home">Home</a>
|
|
<a href="#teaching">Teaching</a>
|
|
<a href="#research">Research</a>
|
|
<a href="#service">Service</a>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="main" id="home">
|
|
<p> </p><br>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<h1>YANG, Chen</h1>
|
|
<div id="shadowbox">
|
|
<table>
|
|
<tbody>
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td width="5"></td>
|
|
<td width="160"><img src="ME.jpeg" width="160"></td>
|
|
<td width="20"></td>
|
|
<td>
|
|
Assistant Professor <br>
|
|
<a class="extlink" href="http://www.se.cuhk.edu.hk" target="_blank">Department of Systems Engineering and
|
|
Engineering Management</a> <br>
|
|
<a class="extlink" href="https://www.erg.cuhk.edu.hk/erg/">Faculty of Engineering</a> <br>
|
|
The Chinese University of Hong Kong <br><br>
|
|
<i class="fas fa-map-marker-alt"></i>
|
|
Room 511A, William M.W. Mong Engineering Building <br>
|
|
The Chinese University of Hong Kong <br>
|
|
Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong<br><br>
|
|
<i class="fas fa-envelope"></i> cyang at se.cuhk.edu.hk <br>
|
|
<i class="fas fa-phone-alt"></i> +852 3943-8322 <br>
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
</tbody>
|
|
</table>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<hr id="teaching" class="style-zero">
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<h3>Teaching <br> <a class="extlink" href="https://blackboard.cuhk.edu.hk" target="_blank">[Blackboard@CUHK]</a></h3>
|
|
Undergraduate Courses
|
|
<ul class="notATable">
|
|
<li><label><b>Spring 2020-2025 </b></label>
|
|
<div>SEEM3580 Risk Analysis for Financial Engineering</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li><label><b>Fall 2019-2024 </b></label>
|
|
<div>SEEM3590 Investment Science</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
Postgraduate Courses
|
|
<ul class="notATable">
|
|
<li><label><b> Spring 2025 </b></label>
|
|
<div>SEEM5410 Optimal Control</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li><label><b> Spring 2023 </b></label>
|
|
<div>SEEM5670 Advanced Models in Financial Engineering</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li><label><b> Fall 2021 </b></label>
|
|
<div>SEEM5340 Stochastic Calculus (with <a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/site/xuedonghepage/home"
|
|
target="_blank">Xuedong He</a> and <a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/view/lingfeili"
|
|
target="_blank">Lingfei Li</a>)</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</p>
|
|
<hr id="research" class="style-one">
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<h3>Research Interest</h3>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:square">
|
|
<li> Portfolio Selection </li>
|
|
<li> Market Frictions and Microstructure (Capital Gains Tax, Price Impact, Transaction Costs) </li>
|
|
<li> FinTech (Decentralized Exchanges, Stablecoins, DeFi Lending) </li>
|
|
<li> Stochastic Control </li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<hr class="style-one">
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<h3>Selected Publications</h3>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>Arbitraging on Decentralized Exchanges (with <a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/site/xuedonghepage/home"
|
|
target="_blank">Xuedong He</a> and <a class="authorlink" href="https://hk.linkedin.com/in/yutian-zhou-555870189" target="_blank">Yutian Zhou</a>).<br>
|
|
Working Paper. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_arbDEX');return false">Abstract</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_arbDEX">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are alternative venues to centralized exchanges to trade
|
|
cryptocurrencies (CEXs) and have become increasingly popular. An arbitrage opportunity arises when
|
|
the exchange rate of two cryptocurrencies in a DEX differs from that in a CEX. Arbitrageurs can then
|
|
trade on the DEX and CEX to make a profit. Trading on the DEX incurs a gas fee, which determines the
|
|
priority of the trade being executed. We study a gas-fee competition game between two arbitrageurs
|
|
who maximize their expected profit from trading. We derive the unique symmetric mixed Nash
|
|
equilibrium and find that (i) the arbitrageurs may choose not to trade when the arbitrage
|
|
opportunity is small; (ii) the probability of the arbitrageurs choosing a higher gas fee is lower;
|
|
(iii) the arbitrageurs pay a higher gas fee and trade more when the arbitrage opportunity becomes
|
|
larger and when liquidity becomes higher. The above findings are consistent with our empirical
|
|
study. </i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Portfolio Selection with Time-Varying Taxation (with Xianhao Zhu).<br>
|
|
Working Paper. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_TaxTimeVarying');return false">Abstract</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_TaxTimeVarying">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>The capital gains tax rate has fluctuated significantly over time, leading to substantial changes in
|
|
investors' optimal strategies, as documented by the empirical studies. This paper proposes a novel
|
|
continuous-time portfolio selection framework with a time-varying capital gains tax rate. Featuring
|
|
differential tax rate announcement time and implementation time, our framework is able to capture
|
|
the investors' anticipation over a potential future tax rate change before its announcement, as well
|
|
as their reaction to an announced tax change yet to be implemented. The optimal investment strategy
|
|
embodies the interaction between the time-varying tax rate and the lock-in and diversification
|
|
effects proposed in the existing literature. Furthermore, our findings provide theoretical support
|
|
for the permanent and transitory effects of tax rate changes documented in the empirical studies.
|
|
The strength of the transitory effect depends on the size of the tax rate change, and the tax rate
|
|
uncertainty mostly affects the transitory effect and has a negligible impact on the permanent
|
|
effect. Moreover, the permanent effect vanishes under a zero interest rate while the transitory
|
|
effect persists. </i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Periodic Evaluation with Non-Concave Utility (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=OzeF8T0AAAAJ&hl" target="_blank">Cong Qin</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.ma.ic.ac.uk/~hz/"> Harry Zheng</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_periodicEvaluation');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5305617" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_periodicEvaluation">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>A fund manager's performance is often evaluated annually and compared with a benchmark, such as a
|
|
market index. In addition, the manager may be subject to trading constraints, such as limited use of
|
|
leverage, no short-selling, and a forced liquidation clause. We formulate this as a periodic
|
|
evaluation problem with a non-concave utility, a stochastic reference point, and trading
|
|
constraints. The value function is characterized as the unique solution to a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman
|
|
equation with periodic terminal and boundary conditions, which must be imposed carefully due to
|
|
possible discontinuities at the terminal time and/or on the liquidation boundary. We find that, at
|
|
the evaluation time, future investment opportunities induce a discontinuity in the value function on
|
|
the liquidation boundary, leading to a substantial change in local risk-aversion. More importantly,
|
|
this local concavity/convexity weakens and shifts inward from the liquidation boundary to the
|
|
interior region as the evaluation horizon increases. As a result, the joint effect of periodic
|
|
evaluation and forced liquidation can generate highly nonlinear investment strategies, which is
|
|
helpful in understanding the complexity of trading strategies in the loss region.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Pricing Model for Data Assets in Investment-Consumption Framework with Ambiguity (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=os0TtfkAAAAJ&hl=en" target="_blank">Xiaoshan Chen</a>
|
|
and <a class="authorlink" href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zhou-Yang-9" target="_blank">Zhou Yang</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_dataAsset');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5263455" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16106" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_dataAsset">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Data assets are data commodities that have been processed, produced, priced, and traded based on
|
|
actual demand. Reasonable pricing mechanism for data assets is essential for developing the data
|
|
market and realizing their value. Most existing literature approaches data asset pricing from the
|
|
seller's perspective, focusing on data properties and collection costs, however, research from the
|
|
buyer's perspective remains scarce. This gap stems from the nature of data assets: their value lies
|
|
not in direct revenue generation but in providing informational advantages that enable enhanced
|
|
decision-making and excess returns. This paper addresses this gap by developing a pricing model
|
|
based on the informational value of data assets from the buyer's perspective. We determine data
|
|
asset prices through an implicit function derived from the value functions in two robust
|
|
investment-consumption problems under ambiguity markets via indifference pricing principle. By the
|
|
existing research results, we simplify the value function, using mathematical analysis and
|
|
differential equation theory, we derive general expressions for data assets price and explore their
|
|
properties under various conditions. Furthermore, we derive the explicit pricing formulas for
|
|
specific scenarios and provide numerical illustration to describe how to use our pricing model.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Arbitrage in Perpetual Contracts (with <a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home"
|
|
target="_blank">Min Dai</a> and <a class="authorlink" href="https://sg.linkedin.com/in/linfeng-li-263843184" target="_blank">Linfeng Li</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_arbPerp');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5262988" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_arbPerp">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Perpetual contracts, designed to track the underlying price through a funding swap mechanism, have
|
|
gained significant popularity in cryptocurrency markets. However, observed price discrepancies
|
|
between perpetual contracts and the underlying asset cannot be explained solely by transaction fees.
|
|
By examining the impact of the clamping function inherent in the funding swap mechanism -- an
|
|
overlooked aspect in existing literature -- we derive model-free no-arbitrage bounds for perpetual
|
|
contracts. Our findings reveal that these bounds persist as intervals even without transaction fees,
|
|
due to the clamping function. Empirical analysis using two years of Binance data supports the
|
|
validity of our proposed bounds. </i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Optimal Tax-Timing with Transaction Costs (with <a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home"
|
|
target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, Yaoting Lei, and <a class="authorlink" href="http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/liuh/"
|
|
target="blank">Hong Liu</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_TaxTC');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4952040" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_TaxTC">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We develop a dynamic portfolio model incorporating capital gains tax (CGT), transaction costs, and
|
|
year-end taxation. We find that even tiny transaction costs can lead to significant deferral of
|
|
large losses and transaction costs affect loss deferrals much more than gain deferrals. Our model
|
|
can thus help explain the puzzle that even when investors face equal long-term/short-term CGT rates,
|
|
they may still defer realizing large capital losses for an extended period of time, displaying the
|
|
disposition effect. In addition, we find misestimating transaction costs is costly. We also provide
|
|
several unique, empirically testable predictions and shed light on recently proposed tax policy
|
|
changes.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Optimal Design of Automated Market Makers on Decentralized Exchanges (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/site/xuedonghepage/home" target="_blank">Xuedong He</a> and <a class="authorlink" href="https://hk.linkedin.com/in/yutian-zhou-555870189" target="_blank">Yutian Zhou</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_AMM');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4801468" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13291" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_AMM">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Automated market makers are a popular mechanism used on decentralized exchange, through which users
|
|
trade assets with each other directly and automatically through a liquidity pool and a fixed pricing
|
|
function. The liquidity provider contributes to the liquidity pool by supplying assets to the pool,
|
|
and in return, they earn trading fees from investors who trade in the pool. We propose a model of
|
|
optimal liquidity provision in which a risk-averse liquidity provider decides the amount of wealth
|
|
she would invest in the decentralized market to provide liquidity in a two-asset pool, trade in a
|
|
centralized market, and consume in multiple periods. We derive the liquidity provider's optimal
|
|
strategy and the optimal design of the automated market maker that maximizes the liquidity
|
|
provider's utility. We find that the optimal unit trading fee increases in the volatility of the
|
|
fundamental exchange rate of the two assets. We also find that the optimal pricing function is
|
|
chosen to make the asset allocation in the liquidity pool efficient for the liquidity provider.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Calibration of Local Volatility Models under the Implied Volatility Criterion (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=MbbX8kUAAAAJ&hl=en" target="_blank">Xinfu Chen</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, and <a class="authorlink" href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zhou-Yang-9" target="_blank">Zhou Yang</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_LocalVol');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href=" https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4801520" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_LocalVol">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We study non-parametric calibration of local volatility models, which is formulated as an inverse
|
|
problem of partial differential equations with Tikhonov regularization. In contrast to the existing
|
|
literature minimizing the distance between theoretical and market prices of options as a calibration
|
|
criterion, we instead minimize the distance between theoretical and market implied volatilities,
|
|
complying with market practices. We prove that our calibration criterion naturally leads to the
|
|
well-posedness of the calibration problem. In particular, comparing to Jiang and Tao (2001), we
|
|
obtain a global uniqueness result, where no additional weight functions are required. Numerical
|
|
results reveal that our method achieves a better trade-off between minimizing calibration errors and
|
|
reducing overfitting.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Patience is a Virtue: Optimal Investment in the Presence of Market Resilience (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www1.se.cuhk.edu.hk/~nchenweb/index.htm" target="_blank">Nan Chen</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, and Qiheng Ding).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_LOB');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4671774" target="_blank">SSRN</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_LOB">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>This paper investigates an optimal investment problem in an illiquid market, modeling explicitly the
|
|
effects of three key features of market microstructure --- market tightness, market depth, and
|
|
finite market resilience --- on the investor's decision. By employing a Bachelier process to model
|
|
the dynamic of the fundamental value of the asset and assuming CARA-type utility for the investor,
|
|
we manage to obtain the investor's optimal dynamic trading strategy in closed form by solving the
|
|
resulting high-dimensional singular control problem. Furthermore, we extend the model to incorporate
|
|
return-predicting signals and utilize an asymptotic expansion approach to derive approximate optimal
|
|
trading strategies. The theoretical and numerical results emphasize the vital role of patience.
|
|
Specifically, rather than dispersing small trades continuously over time as advocated by the
|
|
existing literature, our findings suggest that investors should strategically time their trading
|
|
activities to align with the aim portfolio in the presence of market resilience. To quantify this
|
|
timing decision, we introduce a patience index that enables investors to strike a balance among
|
|
various competing goals, including achieving currently optimal risk exposure, incorporating signals
|
|
about future predictions, and minimizing trading costs, by leveraging market resilience.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Non-Concave Utility Maximization with Transaction Costs (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/shuaijie-qian" target="_blank">Shuaijie Qian</a>).<br>
|
|
<b>submitted</b>. [<a class="paperlink" href="" onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_NonconcaveTC');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4500965" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02178" target="_blank">arXiv</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_NonconcaveTC">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>This paper studies a finite-horizon portfolio selection problem with non-concave terminal utility and
|
|
proportional transaction costs. The commonly used concavification principle for terminal value is no
|
|
longer valid here, and we establish a proper theoretical characterization of this problem. We first
|
|
give the asymptotic terminal behavior of the value function, which implies any transaction close to
|
|
maturity only provides a marginal contribution to the utility. After that, the theoretical
|
|
foundation is established in terms of a novel definition of the viscosity solution incorporating our
|
|
asymptotic terminal condition. Via numerical analyses, we find that the introduction of transaction
|
|
costs into non-concave utility maximization problems can prevent the portfolio from unbounded
|
|
leverage and make a large short position in stock optimal despite a positive risk premium and
|
|
symmetric transaction costs.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Designing Stablecoins (with <a class="authorlink" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/yizhoucao/" target="_blank">Yizhou Cao</a>,
|
|
<a class="authorlink" href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.bu.edu/questrom/profile/steven-kou/" target="_blank">Steven Kou</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewei-li/" target="_blank">Lewei Li</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>Mathematical Finance</b></i>, 35(1):263-294, 2025. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_StableCoin');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3856569" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12445" target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_StableCoin">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Stable coins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to other stable financial assets such as U.S. dollar,
|
|
are desirable for payments within blockchain networks, whereby being often called the “Holy Grail of
|
|
cryptocurrency.” However, existing cryptocurrencies are too volatile for these purposes. By using
|
|
the option pricing theory, we design several dual-class structures that offer a fixed income crypto
|
|
asset, a stable coin pegged to a traditional currency, and leveraged investment instruments. To
|
|
understand the impact of the proposed coins on the speculative and non-speculative demands of
|
|
cryptocurrencies, we study equilibrium with and without the stable coins. Our investigation of the
|
|
values of stable coins in presence of jump risk and black-swan type events shows the robustness of
|
|
the design.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>An Equilibrium Model for the Cross Section of Liquidity Premia (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~jmuhleka/" target="_blank">Johannes Muhle-Karbe</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://xf-shi.github.io" target="_blank">Xiaofei Shi</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>Mathematics of Operations Research</b></i>, 48(3):1423-1453, 2023. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_LiqPre');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3738500" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13625" target="_blank">arXiv</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/moor.2022.1307" target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_LiqPre">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We study a risk-sharing economy where an arbitrary number of heterogenous agents trades an arbitrary
|
|
number of risky assets subject to quadratic transaction costs. For linear state dynamics, the
|
|
forward-backward stochastic differential equations characterizing equilibrium asset prices and
|
|
trading strategies in this context reduce to a system of matrix-valued Riccati equations. We prove
|
|
the existence of a unique global solution and provide explicit asymptotic expansions that allow us
|
|
to approximate the corresponding equilibrium for small transaction costs. These tractable
|
|
approximation formulas make it feasible to calibrate the model to time series of prices and trading
|
|
volume, and to study the cross-section of liquidity premia earned by assets with higher and lower
|
|
trading costs. This is illustrated by an empirical case study.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Leveraged Exchange-Traded Funds with Market Closure and Frictions (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.bu.edu/questrom/profile/steven-kou/" target="_blank">Steven Kou</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://people.math.ethz.ch/~hmsoner/" target="blank">H. Mete Soner</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>Management Science</b></i>, 69(4):2517-2535, 2023. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_LETF');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3856573" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4407" target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_LETF">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>Although leveraged ETFs are popular products for retail investors, how to hedge them poses a great
|
|
challenge to financial institutions. We develop an optimal rebalancing (hedging) model for leveraged
|
|
ETFs in a comprehensive setting, including overnight market closure and market frictions. The model
|
|
allows for an analytical optimal rebalancing strategy.
|
|
The result extends the principle of "aiming in front of target" introduced by <a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jofi.12080" target="_black">Gârleanu
|
|
and Pedersen (2013)</a> from a constant weight between current and future positions to a
|
|
time-varying weight, because the rebalancing performance is monitored only at discrete time points
|
|
but the rebalancing takes place continuously. Empirical findings and implications for the weekend
|
|
effect and the intraday trading volume are also presented.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>A Stochastic Representation for Nonlocal Parabolic PDEs with Applications (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.bu.edu/questrom/profile/steven-kou/" target="_blank">Steven Kou</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>Mathematics of Operations Research</b></i>, 47(3):1707-1730, 2022 [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_FK');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3541591" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/moor.2020.1061" target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_FK">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We establish a stochastic representation for a class of nonlocal parabolic terminal-boundary value
|
|
problems, whose terminal and boundary conditions depend on the solution in the interior domain; in
|
|
particular, the solution is represented as the expectation of functionals of a diffusion process
|
|
with random jumps from boundaries. We discuss three applications of the representation, the first
|
|
one on the pricing of dual-purpose funds, the second one on the connection to regenerative
|
|
processes, and the third one on modeling the entropy on a one-dimensional non-rigid body.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Inventory Management for High-Frequency Trading with Imperfect Competition (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sherrma/" target="blank">Sebastian Herrmann</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~jmuhleka/" target="blank">Johannes Muhle-Karbe</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dapeng-shang-654316105/" target="blank">Dapeng Shang</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics</b></i>, 11(1):1-26, 2020. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_HFT');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3232037" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05169" target="_blank">arXiv</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/18M1207776" target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_HFT">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We study Nash equilibria for inventory-averse high-frequency traders (HFTs), who trade to exploit
|
|
information about future price changes. For discrete trading rounds, the HFTs' optimal trading
|
|
strategies and their equilibrium price impact are described by a system of nonlinear equations;
|
|
explicit solutions obtain around the continuous-time limit. Unlike in the risk-neutral case, the
|
|
optimal inventories become mean-reverting and vanish as the number of trading rounds becomes large.
|
|
In contrast, the HFTs' risk-adjusted profits and the equilibrium price impact converge to their
|
|
risk-neutral counterparts. Compared to a social-planner solution for cooperative HFTs, Nash
|
|
competition leads to excess trading, so that marginal transaction taxes in fact decrease market
|
|
liquidity.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
|
|
<li>Optimal Tax-timing with Asymmetric Long-term/short-term Capital Gains Tax (with <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://sites.google.com/view/mindai/home" target="_blank">Min Dai</a>, <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/liuh/" target="blank">Hong Liu</a> and <a class="authorlink"
|
|
href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/yifei-zhong-12858524/" target="_blank">Yifei Zhong</a>).<br>
|
|
<i><b>The Review of Financial Studies</b></i>, 28.9:2687-2721, 2015. [<a class="paperlink" href=""
|
|
onclick="toggleAbstract('abs_taxTiming');return false">Abstract</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1786012" target="_blank">SSRN</a>|<a class="paperlink"
|
|
href=https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/28/9/2687/1581078, target="_blank">Article</a>]<br>
|
|
<div style="display:none" id="abs_taxTiming">
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<i>We develop an optimal tax-timing model that takes into account asymmetric long-term and short-term
|
|
tax rates for positive capital gains and limited tax deductibility of capital losses. In contrast to
|
|
the existing literature, this model can help explain why many investors not only defer short-term
|
|
capital losses to long term but also defer large long-term capital gains and losses. Because the
|
|
benefit of tax deductibility of capital losses increases with the short-term tax rates, effective
|
|
tax rates can decrease as short-term capital gains tax rates increase.</i>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<hr class="style-one">
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<h3>Grants</h3>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:square">
|
|
<li> General Research Fund, <i>Continuous-Time Nonconcave Portfolio Selection with General Payoffs and
|
|
Transaction Costs</i>, 2023 - 2026</li>
|
|
<li> General Research Fund (ECS), <i>High-Dimensional Continuous-Time Portfolio Selection with Capital Gains
|
|
Tax</i>, 2022 - 2024</li>
|
|
<li> Direct Grant, <i>Hedging Periodic Cash Flow Streams under Market Frictions</i>, 2020 - 2022 </li>
|
|
<li> Start-up Grant at CUHK </li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<hr id="service" class="style-one">
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<h3>Professional Service</h3>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:square">
|
|
<li> <b>Associate Editor:</b> <a class="jourlink" href="https://www.springer.com/journal/42521" target="_blank"><i><b>Digital
|
|
Finance</b></i></a>, 2020 - Present</li><br>
|
|
<li> <b>Reviewer:</b>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
|
|
<li> Management Science, Operations Research, Mathematics of Operations Research. </li>
|
|
<li> Mathematical Finance, Finance and Stochastics, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Quantitative
|
|
Finance, Mathematics and Financial Economics. </li>
|
|
<li> European Financial Management, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, International Journal of
|
|
Theoretical and Applied Finance, Economic Modelling. </li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
<li> <b>Conference Organizing:</b>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
|
|
<li> Session Chair, <b>ME14 Quantitative Finance and FinTech</b>, 2024 INFORMS Annual Meeting, 2024.
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li> Local Organizing Committee Member, <a class="jourlink" href="https://events.polyu.edu.hk/icfe/home"
|
|
target='_blank'><b>First INFORMS Conference on Financial Engineering and FinTech</b></a>, 2024. </li>
|
|
<li> Session Chair, <b>TA73 Financial Frictions and Machine Learning</b>, 2023 INFORMS Annual Meeting,
|
|
2023. </li>
|
|
<li> Local Organizing Committee Member, <a class="jourlink"
|
|
href="https://www.polyu.edu.hk/ama/news-and-events/events/2023/8/recent-advances-on-quantitative-finance/"
|
|
target="_blank"><b>Recent Advances on Quantitative Finance</b></a>, 2023. </li>
|
|
<li> Mini-Symposium Organizer, <a class="jourlink"
|
|
href="https://meetings.siam.org/sess/dsp_programsess.cfm?SESSIONCODE=70910"
|
|
target="_blank"><b>MS5 Investment and Asset Pricing under Market Frictions</b></a>, SIAM
|
|
Conference on Financial Mathematics and Engineering (FM21), 2021. </li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li><br>
|
|
<li> <b> Seminar Organizing:</b>
|
|
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
|
|
<li> Organizing Committee Member, <a class="extlink" href="https://sites.google.com/view/hksgfinmatheng/home"
|
|
target="_blank"><b>The Hong Kong - Singapore Joint Seminar Series in Financial
|
|
Mathematics/Engineering</b></a>.</li>
|
|
<li> Organizing Committee Member, <a class="extlink" href="https://www.cfe.cuhk.edu.hk/cuhkqf/" target="_blank"><b>CUHK
|
|
Distinguished Lectures in Quantitative Finance</b></a>.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<!-- <hr class="curve"> -->
|
|
|
|
<div align="right">
|
|
<font size="-1"></font>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="container">
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
<div class="ball"></div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
</html> |